Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol ; 42(5): 808-814, 2021 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1376688

ABSTRACT

Robotic interventional neuroradiology is an emerging field with the potential to enhance patient safety, reduce occupational hazards, and expand systems of care. Endovascular robots allow the operator to precisely control guidewires and catheters from a lead-shielded cockpit located several feet (or potentially hundreds of miles) from the patient. This has opened up the possibility of expanding telestroke networks to patients without access to life-saving procedures such as stroke thrombectomy and cerebral aneurysm occlusion by highly-experienced physicians. The prototype machines, first developed in the early 2000s, have evolved into machines capable of a broad range of techniques, while incorporating newly automated maneuvers and safety algorithms. In recent years, preliminary clinical research has been published demonstrating the safety and feasibility of the technology in cerebral angiography and intracranial intervention. The next step is to conduct larger, multisite, prospective studies to assess generalizability and, ultimately, improve patient outcomes in neurovascular disease.


Subject(s)
Nervous System Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Radiography, Interventional/methods , Robotics/methods , Humans , Nervous System Diseases/surgery , Stroke/diagnostic imaging , Stroke/surgery , Telemedicine , Thrombectomy
2.
J Vasc Interv Radiol ; 32(9): 1319-1327, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1292834

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of computed tomography (CT) fluoroscopy-guided core lung biopsies with emphasis on diagnostic yield, complications, and efficacy of parenchymal and pleural blood patching to avoid chest tube placement. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective analysis of CT fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous core lung biopsies between 2006 and 2020. Parenchymal blood patching during introducer needle withdrawal was performed in 74% of cases as a preventive measure, and pleural blood patching was the primary salvage maneuver for symptomatic or growing pneumothorax in 60 of 83 (72.2%) applicable cases. RESULTS: A total of 1,029 patients underwent 1,112 biopsies (532 men; mean age, 66 years; 38.6%, history of emphysema; lesion size, 16.7 mm). The diagnostic yield was 93.6% (1,032/1,103). Fewer complications requiring intervention were observed in patients who underwent parenchymal blood patching (5.7% vs 14.2%, P < .001). Further intervention was required in 83 of 182 pneumothorax cases, which included the following: (a) pleural blood patch (5.4%, 60/1,112), (b) chest tube placement without a pleural blood patch attempt (1.5%, 17/1,112), and (c) simple aspiration (0.5%, 6/1,112). Pleural blood patch as monotherapy was successful in 83.3% (50/60) of cases without need for further intervention. The overall chest tube rate was 2.6% (29/1,112). Emphysema was the only significant risk factor for complications requiring intervention (P ≤ .001). CONCLUSIONS: Parenchymal blood patching during introducer needle withdrawal decreased complications requiring intervention. Salvage pleural blood patching reduced the frequency of chest tube placement for pneumothorax.


Subject(s)
Pneumothorax , Radiography, Interventional , Aged , Biopsy , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy , Lung/diagnostic imaging , Male , Pneumothorax/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
7.
Can Assoc Radiol J ; 72(3): 564-570, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-736313

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this national survey was to assess the overall impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the provision of interventional radiology (IR) services in Canada. METHODS: An anonymous electronic survey was distributed via national and regional radiology societies, exploring (1) center information and staffing, (2) acute and on-call IR services, (3) elective IR services, (4) IR clinics, (5) multidisciplinary rounds, (6) IR training, (7) personal protection equipment (PPE), and departmental logistics. RESULTS: Individual responses were received from 142 interventional radiologists across Canada (estimated 70% response rate). Nearly half of the participants (49.3%) reported an overall decrease in demand for acute IR services; on-call services were maintained at centers that routinely provide these services (99%). The majority of respondents (73.2%) were performing inpatient IR procedures at the bedside where possible. Most participants (88%) reported an overall decrease in elective IR services. Interventional radiology clinics and multidisciplinary rounds were predominately transitioned to virtual platforms. The vast majority of participants (93.7%) reported their center had disseminated an IR specific PPE policy; 73% reported a decrease in case volume for trainees by at least 25% and a proportion of trainees will either have a delay in starting their careers as IR attendings (24%) or fellowship training (35%). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on IR services in Canada, particularly for elective cases. Many centers have utilized virtual platforms to provide multidisciplinary meetings, IR clinics, and training. Guidelines should be followed to ensure patient and staff safety while resuming IR services.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/prevention & control , Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Community/statistics & numerical data , Radiography, Interventional/statistics & numerical data , Radiology, Interventional/statistics & numerical data , Academic Medical Centers/organization & administration , After-Hours Care/statistics & numerical data , Canada , Education, Medical, Graduate/statistics & numerical data , Elective Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Fellowships and Scholarships/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Needs and Demand/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Community/organization & administration , Humans , Organizational Policy , Patient Care Team , Personal Protective Equipment , Radiology, Interventional/education , Radiology, Interventional/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires , Teaching Rounds/statistics & numerical data
8.
J Vasc Access ; 22(4): 654-657, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-723976

ABSTRACT

This report aims to illustrate how to perform a venous access to a COVID-19 patient at the bedside. The decision on the type of venous access, the selection of the material necessary to perform the procedure, and the preparation of the operators are described. The described approach can reduce costs, speed up execution times, and make the operator's work safer. Furthermore, these precautions may help control the spread of COVID-19 within the healthcare facility.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Catheterization, Central Venous/methods , Central Venous Catheters , Pandemics , Point-of-Care Testing , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Radiography, Interventional/methods , SARS-CoV-2
9.
Clin Radiol ; 75(10): 794.e19-794.e26, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-671391

ABSTRACT

AIM: To evaluate the response measures in continuing an image-guided intervention service in two tertiary-level musculoskeletal oncology centres during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of all patients undergoing image-guided intervention in the computed tomography (CT) and normal ultrasound (US) rooms from 24 March 2020 to 24 May 2020 (during the COVID-19 pandemic peak) at Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, and Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK. Measures were put in place to address air pressures, airflow direction, aerosol generation, and the safe utilisation of existing scanning rooms and work lists for interventional procedures. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty-one patients (164 at Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital and 167 at Royal Orthopaedic Hospital) underwent image-guided procedures at both sites in the CT and US rooms. At the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, 40% of all procedures were performed under general anaesthesia. These consisted of 47 CT biopsies, 7 CT radiofrequency ablations (RFAs), and 12 US biopsies. At the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, 86% of all procedures were performed under local anaesthetic, with no general anaesthetic procedures. These consisted of 61 CT biopsies and 83 US biopsies. All 256 patients having procedures in the CT room had no post-procedural complications or COVID-19-related symptoms and morbidity on follow-up. CONCLUSION: By adopting a pragmatic approach with meticulous planning, a limited, but fully functional image-guided interventional list can be run without any adverse patient outcomes.


Subject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Musculoskeletal System/diagnostic imaging , Neoplasms/pathology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Radiography, Interventional/statistics & numerical data , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/statistics & numerical data , Ultrasonography, Interventional/statistics & numerical data , Biopsy , COVID-19 , Clinical Protocols , Hospital Design and Construction , Humans , Musculoskeletal System/pathology , Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Personal Protective Equipment , Retrospective Studies , United Kingdom
11.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 215(6): 1499-1503, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-343197

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to present strategies and guidelines that can be implemented in the performance of cross-sectional interventional procedures during the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic. CONCLUSION. Radiologists who perform cross-sectional interventional procedures can take several steps to minimize the risks to patients and radiology personnel, including screening referred patients to decide which procedures can be postponed, using appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), minimizing the number of people involved in procedures, preserving PPE when possible, and applying proper room and equipment cleaning measures.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/prevention & control , Infection Control/standards , Radiography, Interventional/standards , Radiology Department, Hospital/standards , COVID-19/epidemiology , Guidelines as Topic , Humans , Pandemics , Patient Selection , Personal Protective Equipment , SARS-CoV-2 , United States/epidemiology
12.
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis ; 29(8): 104980, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-343178

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has presented unprecedented challenges to healthcare organizations worldwide. A steadily rising number of patients requiring intensive care, a large proportion from racial and ethnic minorities, demands creative solutions to provide high-quality care while ensuring healthcare worker safety in the face of limited resources. Boston Medical Center has been particularly affected due to the underserved patient population we care for and the increased risk of ischemic stroke in patients with COVID-19 infection. METHODS: We present protocol modifications developed to manage patients with acute ischemic stroke in a safe and effective manner while prioritizing judicious use of personal protective equipment and intensive care unit resources. CONCLUSION: We feel this information will benefit other organizations facing similar obstacles in caring for the most vulnerable patient populations during this ongoing public health crisis.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus/pathogenicity , Brain Ischemia/virology , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Endovascular Procedures , Health Services Needs and Demand/organization & administration , Needs Assessment/organization & administration , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Radiography, Interventional , Stroke/therapy , Thrombolytic Therapy , Boston , Brain Ischemia/diagnosis , Brain Ischemia/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Clinical Decision-Making , Coronavirus Infections/diagnosis , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Critical Pathways/organization & administration , Endovascular Procedures/adverse effects , Host Microbial Interactions , Humans , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/diagnosis , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Radiography, Interventional/adverse effects , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Stroke/diagnosis , Stroke/epidemiology , Thrombolytic Therapy/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Triage/organization & administration
13.
Diagn Interv Imaging ; 101(6): 413-415, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-72307

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report the clinical evaluation of a 3D-printed protective face shield designed to protect interventional radiologists from droplet transmission of the SARS-Cov-2. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A protective face shield consisting in a standard transparent polymerizing vinyl chloride (PVC) sheet was built using commercially available 3D printers. The 3D-printed face shield was evaluated in 31 interventional procedures in terms of ability to perform the assigned intervention as usual, quality of visual comfort and tolerance using a Likert scale (from 1, as very good to 5, as extremely poor). RESULTS: The mean rating for ability to perform the assigned intervention as usual was 1.7±0.8 (SD) (range: 1-4). The mean visual tolerance rating was 1.6±0.7 (SD) (range: 1-4). The mean tolerability rating was 1.4±0.7 (SD) (range: 1-3). CONCLUSION: The 3D-printed protective face shield is well accepted in various interventions. It may become an additional option for protection of interventional radiologists.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/prevention & control , Masks , Pandemics/prevention & control , Pneumonia, Viral/prevention & control , Printing, Three-Dimensional , Radiography, Interventional/instrumentation , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Equipment Design/methods , Equipment Reuse , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL